All posts by Norbert Harmanus

Schaakhuis Beker – Novelty Destroyers

Dear chess friends,

On Saturday, the Novelty Destroyers’ HSB cup team played their match in a packed Schaakhuis. An unfortunate encounter for me personally. I am also an active member of Schaakhuis, and play for their second team in the HSB competition. But this is the HSB cup (knock-out format on 4 boards only) and we are determined to win it with the Destroyers this year! Last year, we were kicked out by Schaakhuis in the Schaakhuis in the same round, so this was the right time and place for revenge.

At the same time, the KNSB cup match (national level) Schaakhuis – Caissa was played. Alas, GM Hans Ree (chess journalist and member of Caissa) did not make an appearance. But the team from Amsterdam had an IM (Arno Bezemer) and three other strong players of +-2200, so it was going to be tough for Schaakhuis. Both matches started a bit after 13h. Before the game, Paula expressed her amazement about the obscure places that are used for chess matches in the Netherlands… Churches, basements, scouting club houses and now this tiny shabby café…

image004.jpg

I was not too unhappy about the line-up we were facing. I was playing David on board 1, one of the stronger guys, but he likes to take his time (like me), so I was confident that I could keep more time on the clock than him. At first, I was quite happy about the opening, because David used a lot of time, whereas I have a lot of experience with the opening.

On my left, Paula’s opponent Boudewijn arrived at the board a bit late, which was a bit strange, because he was already in the Schaakhuis earlier. When the game eventually started, an accelerated dragon appeared on the board, with Paula defending the black pieces. Both players were in for a fight. Boudewijn went straight for Paula’s king with f3, g4, h4. Paula countered on the queenside, where normally the white king would reside. Except: Boudewijn’s king was still on e1 (and the queen on d1)! So it was hard for me to evaluate. I trusted that Paula’s rating surplus would somehow start to tell at some point, and I guess it did. (Of course, Boudewijn lamented after the game: “I had +1.9!”, but we all know what that is worth in a practical game.)

image005.jpg

Boards 1 and 2

The game of the day was, without a doubt, played on board 4 by Cesar. Funnily enough, just like me, his opponent Bilal also tried his luck in the Bird opening (1. f4?!). As so often, Cesar’s creative play was objectively not that great, but things became very complicated and sharp. I was not worried, because it was exactly the type of position that Cesar likes, and he has already won many similar games, even with very little time on the clock.

When I saw that Feike got his beloved Morra gambit accepted on the board, I thought he was going to win for sure. He had a lot of pressure and black was passive.

image007

image012.jpg

Boards 3 and 4

Meanwhile, I liked my position less and less and I just couldn’t find a constructive plan. So I decided to basically do nothing and try to keep a bit of time advantage on the clock. If the score would require me to go all out, then I would try something later. But then, Paula crashed through to reach Boudewijn’s king that was still stuck in the middle and won. And shortly afterwards, having come back from a dead lost position and with mere minutes on his clock, Cesar mated a devastated Bilal. 2-0 up! What a luxury!

The rest of my game was rather affected by this situation, combined with time trouble. David went for an exchange sacrifice, which I first thought was just desperation, but then I realised that it was probably just rather good for black, especially when I realised that my planned invasion with Rd1-d7 did not work. So I decided to sacrifice back the exchange to try to draw the endgame with opposite coloured bishops. However, with rooks on the board, it was not so easy. I erroneously sacrificed a pawn to stay active and go for a mating attack (it was possible to defend passively), but this should have failed. We both missed the rather easy defence with 36. … f5! (David was in severe time trouble.) After that missed opportunity for him I was obviously winning, but given the match score and my time also dropping under two minutes, I decided to accept his draw offer. Some technique is also still required in the final position to win it. Meanwhile Reggy had made a remarkable comeback against Feike, and the position was now completely equal, so the players were happy that the match was decided, so they could also make a draw without any consequences.

3-1 with no losses, a very nice afternoon of chess in the Schaakhuis! We now will have to play the Westlanders from WSC in the semi-final. The Schaakhuis KNSB team also lost 3-1, the opposition was simply too strong. Cesar and I stayed a bit to analyse his amazing game. It was really difficult to find the best moves in many positions without using his mobile phone.

I add my own game, don’t try this at home, folks!

Schaakhuis Beker 1810 – Novelty Destroyers Beker 1963 1-3 1 D. Jonkman 1884 – D.H.M. Dekker 1838 ½ – ½ 2 B. van der Haar 1793 – P. Craciun 2089 0 – 1 3 R.B. Brouwers 1879 – F. Liefrink 1962 ½ – ½ 4 B. Yalçin 1682 – C.C. Fernandes João 0 – 1

 

regards,

Derk

Schaakhuis doet zich te goed aan Leidsche Oliebollen

Schaakhuis nam 7 januari deel aan het gezellige Oliebollentoernooi bij LSG. In de B-groep met 14 deelnemende teams werd Schaakhuis ongeslagen 1e, met de rest van de teams op gepaste afstand.

15940856_10154908137866528_5588631511646245537_n

Het speeltempo van 3/2 lag de geoefende Schaakhuizers goed, gezien de scores van Norbert (bord 4) met 19 uit 24 topscorer van de hele B-groep, Gerard met 17,5/24 (bord 3), Marco 17/24 (bord 2) en Tjomme 14/24 (bord 1). De overwinning leverde 80 Euro op, en Norbert kreeg nog een fles wijn als prijs voor topscorer.

15895294_10154908053946528_4178804717240135429_n

Het was zeker een geslaagd toernooi, dus we moeten volgend jaar maar met meer teams meedoen.

Schaakhuis 1 verliest van Souburg

Schaakhuis 1 is er helaas niet in geslaagd om te winnen van Souburg. Op papier waren de teams gelijkwaardig aan elkaar. Dat bleek ook uit de strijd die tot na 17:00 duurde. Aan de invallers heeft het niet gelegen. Die scoorden 2 punten. Volgende keer maar met 8 invallers spelen?

Op bord 1 raakte George een kwaliteit kwijt tegen FM Tiggelman. Hij kreeg er echter ook 2 pionnen voor terug, zodat dat voldoende compensatie was voor remise. [0.5-0.5]

Op bord 7 kwam Norbert niet verder dan remise in een eindspel met P+L vs. P+P en een zooi pionnen.[1-1]

Op bord 8 bleek Bilal beter op de hoogte van de openingstheorie dan zijn tegenstander.  In het vervolg gaf Bilal zijn tegenstander geen kans meer. Een solide overwinning van onze supergemotiveerde invaller. [1-2]

Op bord 6 liet Gerard zich in de tijdnood van zijn tegenstander mat zetten.[2-2]

Op bord 3 presteerde Boudewijn zeer goed bij zijn debuut. Hij overspeelde zijn tegenstander een rating van 2000 en maakte het stijlvol uit. [3-2]

Op bord 5 kwam Tjomme terecht in een slecht eindspel met een pion minder door een onhandigheid. Deze vrijpion was niet meer te stoppen.[3-3]

Op bord 4 had Marco kans om Hekhuis mat te zetten, maar zag het niet. In een afwikkeling verloor hij helaas ook nog een stuk en Hekhuis speelde het eindspel T+L vs T erg sterk uit. [4-3]

Op bord 2 had Mike een pluspion, maar kreeg na oneindig lang proberen zijn tegenstander helaas niet omver. Ook remise. [4.5-3.5]

Dat levert helaas een 4.5-3.5 nederlaag op, waar we zeker kans hadden op meer.  Nogmaals dank aan de invallers Boudewijn en Bilal. 2 overtuigende punten van de 2 B’s. Duidelijker kun je je motivatie en skills niet tonen.

Na afloop smaakte het eten bij het Chinese restaurant in Den Haag desondanks prima.

souburg-schaakhuisknsb2016_3f5

Norbert